IC Markets
A retail prop firm sells you a challenge. Pass it inside the rules and the firm gives you a funded account, usually a larger simulated balance, and pays you 70 to 90 per cent of the profit you make on it. The pitch is that you trade meaningful size without risking meaningful money of your own. The reality is more mixed, and this page works through all of it: how the model actually makes money, the rules one by one, what passing really costs, how payouts work, which firms have failed, and how to choose one that will still be paying in six months.
One thing to be clear about from the start. On most retail prop firms you are trading a simulation the entire time, in the evaluation and after. Your payout is the firm honouring a contract out of its operating margin, not a withdrawal of real market gains. That is legal and disclosed. It also means you are, in effect, an unsecured creditor of a small, lightly regulated company, so its financial health is part of your risk.
How the challenge model works
The evaluation comes in a few shapes. A one-step challenge has a single profit target. A two-step splits it across two phases and is the common default. A three-step is cheaper to enter and slower. Instant funding skips the test for a higher fee and a tight consistency cap. Whichever route, the account is defined by five numbers.
| Rule | Typical setting | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Profit target | 8 to 10% phase one, 4 to 5% phase two | What you must reach to pass |
| Maximum daily loss | 4 to 5% of the starting balance | Breach once and the account is closed |
| Maximum overall drawdown | 8 to 12%, fixed or trailing | The lowest the account can fall |
| Minimum trading days | 3 to 5 | Stops one lucky day passing you |
| Consistency rule | 15 to 50% of profit from any one day | Often on payouts, sometimes on the evaluation |
The daily loss limit fails more traders than the profit target, because it usually counts open trades at their worst point in the day, not just closed losses. The challenge guide has the position-sizing maths, and the trailing drawdown guide covers the rule that ends most funded accounts.
| Route | How it works | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| One-step | One profit target inside the drawdown limits | Faster and cheaper, usually a tighter daily loss limit |
| Two-step | A larger phase-one target, a smaller phase-two target | The default; more time, looser daily limits |
| Three-step | Three smaller phases | Cheapest entry, slowest, more chances to breach |
| Instant funding | Pay a fee, skip the evaluation | No target, but a 15 to 20% consistency cap and a higher price |
The account you are actually trading
There are three stages: the evaluation, sometimes split into two phases; a verification step at a few firms; and the funded account. On most retail firms all three are simulated. You are trading a demo feed the whole way through, and your payout is the firm paying you under a contract, not withdrawing gains from a real market.
A minority of firms move you to a real, capital-backed account once funded, or route consistent winners to a live desk while keeping everyone else on simulation. This is not a detail. On a simulated funded account your money is safe only as long as the firm is solvent and willing to pay, so its finances and its payout record are the thing to check. The funded-account guide covers how to tell which model you are on.
How prop firms actually make money
Around 90 per cent of evaluations fail, and that is the business. For most forex and CFD prop firms the main revenue line is challenge and reset fees, not trading gains, and your payout is drawn from the margin between fees collected and payouts owed. This is the B-book, or demo, model: your orders never reach a real market, and the firm profits when you fail.
A minority of firms run real capital, route your orders to a liquidity provider, and earn from an ongoing share of genuine profit. Some run a hybrid, keeping losing traders on simulation and routing consistent winners to real markets. The model matters to you because a pure demo firm that pays winners from losers' fees can run short of cash if payouts rise or sign-ups slow, which is the mechanism behind most firm collapses. The business-model guide goes into the detail.
A generous profit split from a brand-new firm is not the reassurance it looks like. The split only becomes a real cost to the firm once it has a large funded book, which most new firms never reach. A long, dated payout record tells you far more than the headline percentage.
What getting funded really costs
The advertised number is the challenge fee. The real number includes resets after a breach, fresh challenges after a fail, and the weeks of unpaid work in between. Most traders who reach a first payout have spent one to four months and 1,500 to 3,000 US dollars getting there.
| Item | Typical range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Challenge fee, $100k account | $300 to $600 | One-time, non-refundable |
| Reset after a breach | $50 to $200 | Firms design rules that produce these |
| Time to a first payout | 60 to 90 days | Including the funded-account waiting period |
| Realistic monthly payout, $100k at 3% and 80% | About $2,400 | In a profitable month; many months are zero |
The maths only works if you are already a consistently profitable trader. If you are not, a prop challenge is an expensive way to find that out. The how-much-can-you-make guide runs the numbers, and the real-cost guide adds up the fees.
Payouts, and how they are held up
Splits run 70 to 90 per cent to the trader, with some firms scaling to 90 or 100 over time or on the first slice of profit. Payout schedules vary from every 5 to 7 days on the fastest models to a first payout only after 30 days on others. The things that delay a payout you have earned:
- A consistency rule, if most of your month's profit came from one day.
- KYC checks saved until the first withdrawal rather than done at sign-up.
- A minimum number of trading days on the funded account before a payout unlocks.
- Rule changes introduced after you passed.
The payouts guide covers the schedules, and the payout-proof guide covers how to verify a firm pays before you buy.
The risk that the firm itself fails
My Forex Funds, once the largest retail prop firm, was shut down in 2023 by a US regulator action that locked out more than 120,000 traders for two years. In early 2026 a federal court dismissed that case for regulator misconduct, and the firm is planning a return. MyFundedFX ceased operations in February 2026 with no notice and stopped paying withdrawals. Smaller firms close regularly after a payment-processor cut-off or a cash shortfall.
The warning signs are consistent: withdrawals slowing, support going quiet, and payout rules tightening at short notice. The defence is equally simple. Withdraw profit on the earliest schedule the firm allows, keep no more than one payout cycle sitting in any single firm, and favour a multi-year payout record over a better split. The firm-failures guide has the full pattern.
A funded balance is not capital you can claim. If the firm stops operating, the account and any pending payout usually go with it, and most firms are offshore and lightly regulated enough that legal recourse is not worth the cost.
Where regulation is heading
A US Commodity Futures Trading Commission public consultation on retail prop trading is running through late 2026, with a closing date around 30 November. The EU, UK and Australian regulators are examining the sector too. The collapse of the CFTC's My Forex Funds case removed the precedent it was building, so the timeline is uncertain, but the direction is toward more oversight. Expect tighter rules on client-money handling and KYC, and expect some firms not to survive the change.
Prop account or your own account?
A prop challenge and a small personal account cost about the same to start. What you get for the money is different.
| Prop firm | Your own account | |
|---|---|---|
| Capital at risk | Only the fees | Your whole deposit |
| Size you can trade | $25k to $400k after passing | Whatever you deposit |
| Rules | Firm's drawdown, consistency, trading limits | Your own |
| Counterparty risk | The firm may fail or stop paying | Your broker, usually more regulated |
| Upside | 70 to 90% of profit on a large balance | 100% of profit on a small balance |
| Best for | A consistent trader with little capital | Building a record, or a trader with real capital |
The honest split: if you are already profitable on your own account and just lack capital, a prop firm lets you trade size you could not otherwise afford, and the fee is the cost of that leverage. If you are not yet profitable, the challenge is an expensive diagnostic, and a small live account you actually own teaches the same lessons more cheaply. The is-it-worth-it guide works through the decision.
Choosing a firm, and who this is for
Once you have decided a funded account fits your trading, the checklist is short: a multi-year record of paying traders with dated proof, KYC at sign-up, client funds held separately from the operating account, rules that are clear and stable, and a rule set that matches how you actually trade. A news trader should avoid a strict consistency rule; a swing trader needs generous overnight and weekend holding rules.
The full index sits at the foot of this page: 50 guides across eight groups, from the basics and the rules through passing a challenge, the payout economics, choosing a firm, the scams and firm failures, factual firm reviews and comparisons, and the position by country. FX Recap does not review individual prop firms for commission, so the review and comparison pages are factual profiles you finish checking yourself, not rankings.
Prop firms are not a shortcut to becoming a trader. They are a way for an already-consistent trader to trade larger size for a fee. If you are not profitable on your own account, a challenge is an expensive diagnostic. If you are, choose the firm on its payout history, not its split.
Every guide in this section is built to the same standard: real numbers, named examples, and a clear note wherever something is a general principle rather than advice for your situation. Prop challenges cost money whether you pass or fail, most evaluations are failed, and a funded account carries the added risk that the firm behind it may not last.
Frequently asked
What is prop trading?
In the retail sense, prop trading means passing a paid evaluation set by a proprietary trading firm, then trading a funded account, usually a larger simulated balance, and keeping 70 to 90 per cent of the profit. It is distinct from institutional proprietary trading, where a bank or fund trades its own capital through employed traders.
Are prop firms a scam?
Most of the large, established firms pay. The honest framing is that a prop firm is a small, lightly regulated financial company, and your payout depends on its ability to keep paying out of its operating margin. Some firms have closed or frozen withdrawals with little warning. Choose on payout history, withdraw early, and do not concentrate capital in one firm.
How much does it cost to get funded?
The challenge fee for a $100,000 account runs $300 to $600, but resets after a breach and fresh challenges after a fail push the real cost to $1,500 to $3,000 for most traders who reach a first payout, over one to four months. The maths only works if you are already consistently profitable.
Is my funded prop account real money?
Usually not. Most retail prop firms keep you on a simulated account throughout, and your payout is the firm paying under a contract from its own revenue, not a withdrawal of real market gains. A minority of firms route real orders to a liquidity provider. Check which model a firm uses, because it affects how stable your payout is.
Can I lose money with a prop firm?
You cannot lose more than the fees you pay, since you are not trading your own capital. But most traders lose the fees, because around 90 per cent of evaluations fail and many funded accounts are lost to a drawdown breach within the first month. Budget for the fees as a cost you may not recover.
Are prop firms getting regulated?
The direction is toward more oversight. A US CFTC public consultation runs through late 2026, and EU, UK and Australian regulators are looking at the sector. The dismissal of the CFTC's My Forex Funds case removed the precedent it wanted, so the timing is unclear, but tighter rules on client money and KYC are likely, and some firms will not survive them.
The full index
The 50 guides planned for this section, grouped by what you are working out. They are written and published one at a time.